You can visit us 9am–5pm, Monday to Friday
Request a call back Call us

Protection

Saving people money — a client story

More cover, for less money, with no fee to pay. A short case study on why whole-of-market access matters with protection.

Protection By Fernleigh Wearden & Co 1 November 2019 3 min read
Editor’s note. This case study was first published in November 2019. The premiums quoted were correct at that time and are included to illustrate the approach rather than as an indication of what cover costs today. Individual circumstances vary considerably.

The daughter of one of our existing clients, Ms Cox and her partner Mr Hewitt approached us about some mortgage protection they had taken out several years earlier. They were not unhappy with it. They simply wanted to know whether they were paying more than they needed to.

The situation the clients were in

They held two policies between them:

  • A joint mortgage protection plan, so that if either of them died before the end of the mortgage term, the mortgage would be repaid.
  • Income protection for Mr Hewitt, replacing his employment income if he were unable to work through accident or sickness.

Together these were costing them £65 a month.

What they asked for

Simply this: the same or similar cover, at a lower cost.

What we did about it

Because we are independent, we were able to compare across every provider that meets our due diligence standards rather than a fixed panel. We arranged:

  • Mortgage protection with an alternative provider, at a lower monthly cost.
  • Income protection with an alternative provider, again at a lower cost.
  • An additional amount of life cover for Mr Hewitt — something they had not asked for, but which meant that if he died, his partner would receive a lump sum on top of the mortgage being cleared, to support bringing up their children.

The result we achieved

They ended up with everything they already had, plus the extra life cover, for £58 a month. A saving of £7 a month and materially better protection — exactly what they had asked for and then some.

What it cost them in fees

Nothing. Mr Hewitt and Ms Cox chose the option of the insurance company paying us a commission for placing the business, rather than paying us a fee directly. We always set out both options and let the client decide.

Why this happens so often

Many banks and advice firms are tied to a set list of providers. We are not. That means we can obtain comparable cover at a reduced cost more often than people expect — and there is no obligation to proceed if we cannot improve on what you already hold.

Want to talk this through?

A free introductory call with an adviser. No obligation afterwards.

Request a call back

This article is for general information only. It is not personal advice and it is not a recommendation. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change. Fernleigh Wearden & Company Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, firm reference number 929372.

Related reading

More from the team.

All articles

Often relevant alongside this

What people usually ask about next.

Our services

Most people need more than one of these.

Advice areas overlap. Part of our job is spotting which ones actually apply to you.

Rather ask us directly?

Tell us when suits and an adviser will ring you back by the end of the next working day.

Request a call back
Consumer Duty Alliance Chartered Financial Planner Financial Vulnerability Taskforce Pension Transfer Gold Standard